[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090331171840.83fb7dab.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:18:40 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] memcg soft limit (yet another new design) v1
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:09:23 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> memcg's reclaim routine is designed to ignore locality andplacements and
> then, inactive_anon_is_low() function doesn't take "zone" as its argument.
>
> In later soft limit patch, we use "zone" as an arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar23/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -561,15 +561,28 @@ void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(
> spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
> }
>
> -static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *present_pages)
> +static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + unsigned long *present_pages,
> + struct zone *z)
> {
> unsigned long active;
> unsigned long inactive;
> unsigned long gb;
> unsigned long inactive_ratio;
>
> - inactive = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
> - active = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
> + if (!z) {
> + inactive = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg,
> + LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
> + active = mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(memcg, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
> + } else {
> + int nid = z->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> + int zid = zone_idx(z);
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> +
> + mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
> + inactive = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
> + active = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
> + }
>
> gb = (inactive + active) >> (30 - PAGE_SHIFT);
> if (gb)
> @@ -585,14 +598,14 @@ static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct me
> return inactive_ratio;
> }
>
> -int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *z)
> {
> unsigned long active;
> unsigned long inactive;
> unsigned long present_pages[2];
> unsigned long inactive_ratio;
>
> - inactive_ratio = calc_inactive_ratio(memcg, present_pages);
> + inactive_ratio = calc_inactive_ratio(memcg, present_pages, NULL);
The last arguments should be "z" not NULL...
seems posted version is a bit old...OMG, sorry.
I'm now adding bugfix etc..
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists