[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D1DB42.3020903@panasas.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:58:42 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Avishay Traeger <avishay@...il.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
open-osd <osd-dev@...n-osd.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] exofs: file and file_inode operations
On 03/31/2009 11:04 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:58:47 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
>
>> implementation of the file_operations and inode_operations for
>> regular data files.
>>
>> Most file_operations are generic vfs implementations except:
>> - exofs_truncate will truncate the OSD object as well
>> - Generic file_fsync is not good for none_bd devices so open code it
>> - The default for .flush in Linux is todo nothing so call exofs_fsync
>> on the file.
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> +static int exofs_file_fsync(struct file *filp, struct dentry *dentry,
>> + int datasync)
>> +{
>> + int ret1, ret2;
>> + struct address_space *mapping = filp->f_mapping;
>> +
>> + ret1 = filemap_write_and_wait(mapping);
>> + ret2 = file_fsync(filp, dentry, datasync);
>> +
>> + return ret1 ? ret1 : ret2;
>> +}
>
> It might be better to abort if filemap_write_and_wait() failed. if the
> hardware is bad, these things can take a looooong time retrying and
> timing out. There's no point in doubling the delay.
>
>> ...
>>
>
OK I got confused by existing code, good point
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists