linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] dw_dmac: set CAP_PRIVATE capability for DW DMA controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <129600E5E5FB004392DDC3FB599660D790F8C3EB@irsmsx504.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:01:49 +0100
From:	"Sosnowski, Maciej" <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>
To:	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] dw_dmac: set CAP_PRIVATE capability for DW DMA
 controller

Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> This patch adds the private capability for the DW DMA controller. This
> allows the DMA controller to do other DMA transfers than
> memory-to-memory. For example when the DMA controller is used by
> peripherals to transfer data between memory and peripheral.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> index a97c07e..1c5e31d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> @@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ static int __init dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	channel_clear_bit(dw, MASK.DST_TRAN, dw->all_chan_mask);
>  	channel_clear_bit(dw, MASK.ERROR, dw->all_chan_mask);
> 
> +	dma_cap_set(DMA_PRIVATE, dw->dma.cap_mask);
>  	dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dw->dma.cap_mask);
>  	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dw->dma.cap_mask);
>  	dw->dma.dev = &pdev->dev;

Hi Hans,

Adding Dan...

Please note that this way you permenently exclude the device from public use.
If that's your intent that's fine.
Remember however that you can leave the device generally non-private
and attempt as needed to allocate a channel for exclusive usage by dma_request_channel()
- it would set DMA_PRIVATE flag if private channel candidate has been found.

With this note:

Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>

Regards,
Maciej--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/