[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090331145750.GB4792@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:57:50 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Peter Lojkin <ia6432@...ox.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] posix-timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork()
On 03/31, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com) wrote:
> > See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12911
> >
> > copy_signal() copies signal->rlim, but RLIMIT_CPU is "lost". Because
> > posix_cpu_timers_init_group() sets cputime_expires.prof_exp = 0 and thus
> > fastpath_timer_check() returns false unless we have other expired cpu timers.
> >
> > Change copy_signal() to set cputime_expires.prof_exp if we have RLIMIT_CPU.
> > Also, set cputimer.running = 1 in that case. This is not strictly necessary,
> > but imho makes sense.
>
> For -stable should this be instead of 37bebc70d7ad4144c571d74500db3bb26ec0c0eb?
Yes, sorry for confusion.
The commit above was targeted for 2.6.29, it is not optimal. When/if
"[PATCH 1/2] posix-timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork()" will be merged, I'll sent
the "revert" patch.
see http://marc.info/?t=123783777600004
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists