[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2k565splk.fsf@vador.mandriva.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:01:59 +0200
From: Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@...driva.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> writes:
> > Of course, your browsing history database is an excellent example of
> > something you should _not_ care about that much, and where
> > performance is a lot more important than "ooh, if the machine goes
> > down suddenly, I need to be 100% up-to-date". Using fsync on that
> > thing was just stupid, even
>
> If you are doing a ton of web-based work with a bunch of tabs or
> windows open, you really like the post-crash restoration methods that
> Firefox now employs. Some users actually do want to
> checkpoint/restore their web work, regardless of whether it was the
> browser, the window system or the OS that crashed.
This is all about tradeoff.
I guess everybody can afford loosing the last 30 seconds of history (or
5mn ...).
That's not that much of lost work...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists