linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20903311234t63335987l46480cd27a326022@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:34:59 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc:	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:29:20 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> Unfortunately, not so simple.  If I created a dma_device for each
> channel, all chan->chan_id will be 0 and all chan->device->dev points
> same platform device.  This makes client driver hard to select the
> particular channel.  Making a platform device for each channel will
> solve this, but it looks wrong way to go for me.

Why?  mv_xor, iop-adma, and ioat each have a platform or pci device
per channel so you would be in good company.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/