| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:10:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, rmk@....linux.org.uk, starvik@...s.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, davem@...emloft.net, cooloney@...nel.org, kyle@...artin.ca, matthew@....cx, grundler@...isc-linux.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [GIT RFC] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default percpu allocator On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > Please include the patch inline next time. > > What do you mean by "inline"? That the patch should not be the last > thing in the mail? The patch needs to show up when I press reply and not vanish. I guess this was an attachment. > I don't see how changes to the initial per cpu segment should help with > access to per cpu symbols. Can you convince the linker to place the per cpu segment > 4G away from the code? Its a virtual address right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists