[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0903311708540.30693@qirst.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:10:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
starvik@...s.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, davem@...emloft.net,
cooloney@...nel.org, kyle@...artin.ca, matthew@....cx,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [GIT RFC] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default
percpu allocator
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > Please include the patch inline next time.
>
> What do you mean by "inline"? That the patch should not be the last
> thing in the mail?
The patch needs to show up when I press reply and not vanish. I guess this
was an attachment.
> I don't see how changes to the initial per cpu segment should help with
> access to per cpu symbols.
Can you convince the linker to place the per cpu segment > 4G away from
the code? Its a virtual address right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists