[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090331231403.675724428@sous-sol.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:10:52 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>,
Jake Edge <jake@....net>, Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, David S Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [patch 07/45] xfrm: spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state.c
View attachment "xfrm-spin_lock-should-be-spin_unlock-in-xfrm_state.c.patch" of type "text/plain" (1184 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists