[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D19D35.7020407@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:33:57 +0900
From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<flvazquez@...go.es>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix blkdev_issue_flush() failure handling
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:01:16PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
>> Chris, I have just sent patches that attempt to fix both ext3 and
>> ext4 while also adding a per-device sysfs knob tu disable
>> write-flushes. A previous version of this patch set added a new
>> generic mount option but comments from Christoph and others
>> convinced me to turn it into a per-device tunable. Could you take
>> a look at the patches?
>
> Fernando, see my comments on those patches. We don't need to issue a
> barrier after a call to sync_inode() or ext[34]_force_commit(), since
> those functions will issue a barrier for us. It would probably be a
> good idea to use blktrace to test and make sure that we have one and
> exactly one barrier op issued for each fsync().
I'll give blktrace a spin and check if things are working as expected.
Thanks!
- Fernando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists