[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18897.44438.320859.677262@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:43:50 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] pending perf_counter bits
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> Most of the previous set, except I kept the powerpc set_perf_counter_pending()
> bits.
>
> This set also adds callchain support for x86 (no userspace yet -- am looking
> at porting sysprof). Furthermore, it has a first attempt at making
> perf_counters and oprofile and nmi_watchdog not stomp on each other.
>
> New bits only compile tested on x86_64 and ppc64.
Seems to run ok on ppc64, except that the kerneltop output seems to
show fewer functions than before, for some reason.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists