[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090401185418.B204.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:55:45 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: memcg needs may_swap (Re: [patch] vmscan: rename sc.may_swap to may_unmap)
> > > How about making may_swap mean the following:
> > >
> > > @@ -642,6 +639,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
> > > * Try to allocate it some swap space here.
> > > */
> > > if (PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapCache(page)) {
> > > + if (!sc->map_swap)
> > > + goto keep_locked;
> > > if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO))
> > > goto keep_locked;
> > > if (!add_to_swap(page))
> > >
> > > try_to_free_pages() always sets it.
> > >
> > What is the advantage than _not_ scanning ANON LRU at all ?
>
> I thought we could collect anon pages that don't need swap io.
Yes. but Is this important?
if memcg reclaim don't collect sleal swapcache, other global reclaim can.
Am I missing any viewpoint?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists