[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904010830580.12916@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:14:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Luis Henriques <henrix@...o.pt>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] irq: DEBUG_SHIRQ executed on irq setup failure
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Luis Henriques wrote:
> When requesting an IRQ, the DEBUG_SHIRQ code executes a fake IRQ just to make
> sure the driver is ready to receive an IRQ immediately. The problem was that
> this fake IRQ was being executed even if interrupt line failed to be allocated
> by __setup_irq.
Good point !
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <henrix@...o.pt>
> ---
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index a3eb7ba..8e1be16 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> kfree(action);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
> - if (irqflags & IRQF_SHARED) {
> + if (retval && (irqflags & IRQF_SHARED)) {
!retval might actually prevent the situation you described above :)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists