[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D2B2DC.9000401@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:18:36 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
starvik@...s.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, davem@...emloft.net,
cooloney@...nel.org, kyle@...artin.ca, matthew@....cx,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default
percpu allocator
Hello,
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Needs additional feedback and review by Tejun I would think. Just compile
> tested so far. The removal of the rbtree also relaxes locking restrictions
> for pcpu_chunk_address_search (which is not really searching anymore).
>
> Subject: dynamic percpu allocator: Remove rbtree
>
> The rbtree is used to determine the chunk from the virtual address. However,
> we can already determine the page struct from a virtual address and there
> are several unused fields in page struct used by vmalloc. Use the index
> field to store a pointer to the chunk. Then there is no need anymore for
> an rbtree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
This is great. I'll integrate the patch and test it soonish but with
LSF on the next week, I'll probably be slow during the next two weeks.
Thanks a lot.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists