[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090401211851Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:18:43 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: jens.axboe@...cle.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, tj@...nel.org, bharrosh@...asas.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] block: fix SG_IO vector request data length
handling
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:50:58 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01 2009, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:04:38 +0900
> > Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Impact: fix SG_IO behavior such that it matches the documentation
> > >
> > > SG_IO howto says that if ->dxfer_len and sum of iovec disagress, the
> > > shorter one wins. However, the current implementation returns -EINVAL
> > > for such cases. Trim iovc if it's longer than ->dxfer_len.
> >
> > Is that description about sg's SG_IO?
>
> The more important question is what sg.c actually does, that's more
> important than the documentation.
Do you think that Doug is a person who makes such mistake? ;)
Seems that sg worked as the howto says. But I think that I broke it
when I converted sg to use the block layer. I'll fix it soon.
About this patch, as we know, there are lots of subtle differences
between sg's SG_IO and the block's. I'm not sure that it's a good idea
to change the behavior of the block's SG_IO.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists