[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090401122516.GH12966@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:25:16 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/filters: add run-time field descriptions to
TRACE_EVENT_FORMAT events
* Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com> wrote:
> > Oh, do you know why these unfiltered event are disappearing?
>
> It's because of the way ring_buffer_discard() currently works -
> the filtered events are still there in the ring buffer taking up
> space; they just aren't visible in the output because the read
> skips over them.
>
> So if there's a high volume of events being recorded, any given
> event can be quickly overwritten before it has a chance to be
> read, or it may have been read and appeared in the output, but
> between the time it was read and the next cat, could easily have
> been overwritten, and therefore 'disappears' on the next cat.
>
> It's really no different from the normal case where there is no
> filtering in place - the same thing would happen but you wouldn't
> notice whether a particular event was still there or not the next
> time you cat'ed the file, because of the large volume of events
> being displayed. It's just more apparent when most of the events
> are discarded and invisible.
>
> At least that's my theory based on my understanding of how the
> ring-buffer works...
Correct, and this needs to be fixed.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists