[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090401170708.GA14167@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:07:08 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@...il.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, dsilvers@...tec.co.uk,
toshiba_acpi@...ebeam.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] toshiba-acpi: Support TOS1900-type devices
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:03:05AM +1700, Azael Avalos wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't be reading directly from TOHK at any point. It seems
> > to be a purely internal variable - I'm fairly sure that the INFO method
> > is the only one that should be called on event generation.
>
> Well, on the patches sent to the omnibook module I was polling TOHK directly,
> it is until now that I realized that I can poll the events via INFO
> method, that is,
> if I enable TECF first via method \\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC0.NTFY
Mm. None of the TOS1900 DSDTs I have here have TECF or NTFY methods, so
again that doesn't sound like the right way of driving them. Does the
ENAB method not do this?
> >
> >> On the patches I sent to the omnibook module I'm able to get events but they
> >> seem to get repeated 3 times, or perhaps I'm polling to often.
> >
> > Hm. I don't have test hardware right now, I'm afraid. I'll look at some
> > DSDTs a bit more and see if anything springs to mind.
>
> Well, I brought my laptop to work (I'm a sysadmin so I got plenty of time :-P)
> and I can test if that helps
I'll dig some more and let you know. Thanks!
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists