[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090401143622.b1885643.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:36:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu, drees76@...il.com,
jesper@...gh.cc, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:03:38 -0400
lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 06:25:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The JBD journal is a massive designed-in contention point. It's why
> > for several years I've been telling anyone who will listen that we need
> > a new fs. Hopefully our response to all these problems will soon be
> > "did you try btrfs?".
>
> Oh I look forward to the day when it will be safe to convert my mythtv
> box from ext3 to btrfs. Current kernels just have too much IO latency
> with ext3 it seems. Older kernels were more responsive, but probably
> had other places they were less efficient.
Back in 2002ish I did a *lot* of work on IO latency, reads-vs-writes,
etc, etc (but not fsync - for practical purposes it's unfixable on
ext3-ordered)
Performance was pretty good. From some of the descriptions I'm seeing
get tossed around lately, I suspect that it has regressed.
It would be useful/interesting if people were to rerun some of these
tests with `echo anticipatory > /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler'.
Or with linux-2.5.60 :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists