lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090401145041.6681fc90.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:50:41 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@...il.com>
Cc:	trivial@...nel.org, adilger@....com, mkatiyar@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] : Add dev-id and inode number for debugging in 
 init_special_inode in fs/inode.c

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:11:00 +0530
Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@...il.com> wrote:

> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -1540,7 +1540,8 @@ void init_special_inode(struct inode *inode, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
>  	else if (S_ISSOCK(mode))
>  		inode->i_fop = &bad_sock_fops;
>  	else
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (%o)\n",
> -		       mode);
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (%o) for"
> +				  " inode %s:%lu\n", mode, inode->i_sb->s_id,
> +				  inode->i_ino);
>  }

Is ther a guarantee that inode->i_sb and inode->i_ino have been initialised
at this time?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ