linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH UPDATED] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default percpu allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49D2B07F.80502@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:08:31 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
	starvik@...s.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	cooloney@...nel.org, kyle@...artin.ca, matthew@....cx,
	grundler@...isc-linux.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, rth@...ddle.net,
	ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default
 percpu allocator

Hello,

Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:07:44 +0900
> Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> Okay, this should keep s390 and alpha working till proper solution is
>> found.  Martin, can you please verify?  Ingo, please feel free to push
>> this upstream (or -next) once Martin acks.
> 
> Looks good, everything compiles and the static per-cpu variables are
> resolved via GOTENT:
> 
> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>

Thanks.

> For the proper solution, the easiest fix is imho to define a
> variant of SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR. The macro is currently used for dynamic
> pointers and for per-cpu symbols. We only want to use the GOTENT
> indirection for per-cpu symbols. So why don't we split it into
> 1) SHIFT_PERCPU_SYMBOL for per-cpu symbols and
> 2) SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR for dynamically allocated pointers?
> For s390 the first would be the current SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR macro, the
> second would be a simple RELOC_HIDE. The patch would be really
> short ..

Eh... I wrote in the other reply but unifying the two is kind of one
of the main goals, so....

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/