linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] VFS: Add a VFS helper function vfs_remote_path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090401021554.GV28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2009 03:15:54 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] VFS: Add a VFS helper function
	vfs_remote_path_lookup()

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:50:33PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> The purpose of this patch is to improve the mount path lookup support for
> filesystems such as NFSv4, which require you to look up a mount path
> string in a remote server's namespace.
> 
> Traversing such a path is pretty much identical to walking a local path,
> in that it may involve following symlinks and even following referrals to
> volumes that reside on other servers. Since the standard VFS path lookup
> code already supports all these features (using in-kernel automounts for
> following referrals) it would be nice to be able to reuse that code rather
> than special case the mount path lookup in the NFS client.
> 
> This patch therefore defines a VFS helper function that sets up a temporary
> mount namespace to represent the server namespace, and has the current
> task pivot into that prior to doing the path lookup. Upon completion, it
> pivots back into the original namespace, and destroys the private one.

NAK.  You are relying on too many things about caller (e.g. just what happens
if you have shared fs_struct?  Does caller guarantee it won't happen?), so
that's a bloody bad interface.  Open-code that sucker, then let's see what
to do with surrounding code.  As it stands - no.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/