lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18898.58399.957182.181124@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:48:47 +1100
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] perf_counter: provide generic callchain bits

Peter Zijlstra writes:

> That still has the record and read things separate, but as one unified
> overflow output.

I take it PERF_EVENT_OVERFLOW refers to counter overflow, not ring
buffer overflow?  That had me confused for a bit, so more explicit
naming, or at least some comments, would be good.

>  /*
> + * Bits that can be set in hw_event.record_type to request information
> + * in the overflow packets.
> + */
> +enum perf_counter_record_format {
> +	PERF_RECORD_IP		= 1U << 0,
> +	PERF_RECORD_TID		= 1U << 1,
> +	PERF_RECORD_GROUP	= 1U << 2,
> +	PERF_RECORD_CALLCHAIN	= 1U << 3,
> +};
[snip]
>  enum perf_event_type {
>  
> -	PERF_EVENT_GROUP	= 1,
> -
> -	PERF_EVENT_MMAP		= 2,
> -	PERF_EVENT_MUNMAP	= 3,
> +	PERF_EVENT_MMAP		= 1,
> +	PERF_EVENT_MUNMAP	= 2,
>  
>  	PERF_EVENT_OVERFLOW	= 1UL << 31,
>  	__PERF_EVENT_IP		= 1UL << 30,
>  	__PERF_EVENT_TID	= 1UL << 29,
> -	__PERF_EVENT_CALLCHAIN  = 1UL << 28,
> +	__PERF_EVENT_GROUP	= 1UL << 28,
> +	__PERF_EVENT_CALLCHAIN  = 1UL << 27,

Could we use the same value (and even the same name) for
PERF_RECORD_IP/__PERF_EVENT_IP, PERF_RECORD_TID/__PERF_EVENT_TID,
etc.?

Also, I haven't looked at the callchain stuff much, but does the
callchain info contain a recognizable end delimiter?  At present the
callchain comes last, but if we add more output elements they'll
presumably go after it, so working out where the callchain ends may
become tricky if we're not careful.

Also, let's add PERF_RECORD/PERF_EVENT bits for:

* EVENT_INSTR_ADDR
* EVENT_DATA_ADDR
* EVENT_INSTR_FLAGS
* EVENT_CPU_FLAGS	(so we can distinguish hypervisor/kernel/user)

We would have to call into arch code to get the values for these.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ