[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090402012215.GE1117@x200.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:22:15 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, avi@...hat.com,
chrisw@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, hugh@...itas.com, corbet@....net,
yaniv@...hat.com, dmonakhov@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] add ksm kernel shared memory driver.
* Anthony Liguori (anthony@...emonkey.ws) wrote:
> The ioctl() interface is quite bad for what you're doing. You're
> telling the kernel extra information about a VA range in userspace.
> That's what madvise is for. You're tweaking simple read/write values of
> kernel infrastructure. That's what sysfs is for.
I agree re: sysfs (brought it up myself before). As far as madvise vs.
ioctl, the one thing that comes from the ioctl is fops->release to
automagically unregister memory on exit. This needs to be handled
anyway if some -p pid is added to add a process after it's running,
so less weight there.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists