[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238670826.8530.5837.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:13:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improving scheduler for asymmetric multi-core processor
in Google's summer of code
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 23:58 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found an interesting problem, scheduling on Asymmetric multi-core processor.
>
> According to this paper,
>
> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1362694&dl=GUIDE&coll=GUIDE&CFID=28487975&CFTOKEN=68150071
>
> taking performance asymmetry into consideration on multi-core CPUs can
> improve scheduler performance.
> (And I think discarding this could have bad consequences.)
>
> So I have a question:
> Is the current scheduler of Linux aware of possible performance
> asymmetry of the cores?
It does not.
> By performance asymmetry I mean a case where different cores run on
> different frequencies.
>
> If something tackling this issue is not implemented yet,
> I would like to work on that as a project of Google's summer of code.
Have at it.
Its a rather delicate business though and should also include scaling
balancing decisions based on time taken by IRQs and RT tasks as well as
incorporate feedback from the cpu. The latter includes things like
cpufreq, but also effective work done by threads on a core.
Its been on my todo list for quite a while, but haven't managed to get
something robust together.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists