[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904021842050.12916@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 18:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@...t.ibm.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Carsten Emde <ce@...g.ch>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
Robin Gareus <robin@...eus.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Philippe Reynes <philippe.reynes@...smpp.fr>,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Announce] 2.6.29-rt2
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Will Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 02:17 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > We are pleased to announce the next update to our new preempt-rt
> > series.
> >
> > - fix a fork/exit bug in the signal per task cache (/me puts on
> > a huge brown paper bag - Thanks to Phillipe Reynes and Will
> > Schmidt for reporting and testing)
> >
> > - fix a group scheduling migration accounting bug (decoded with
> > and fixed by Peter Zijlstra - reported by Robin Gareus)
> >
> > - tlb gather rework by Peter Zijlstra - Thanks Peter !
> >
> > - the usual fixlets
> >
> > The tlb rework might be incomplete on some of the uncountable
> > incarnations of PowerPC and ARM platforms, so look out for wreckage
> > and keep the usual tools (fire-extinguishers, brooms, buckets etc.)
> > handy.
>
> I can confirm that the tlb rework does appear to be missing some parts
> for Power. (Using 2.6.29-rt3 on pseries ppc64)
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.toc1+0x4d0): undefined reference to
> `per_cpu__ppc64_tlb_batch'
> <...>
> mm/built-in.o:(.toc1+0xed0): more undefined references to
> `per_cpu__ppc64_tlb_batch' follow
>
> Not clear to me if this is just missing a "DEFINE_PER_CPU_LOCKED" to
> replace the removed "DEFINE_PER_CPU", (similar to the prior RT patches),
> or if the tlb rework is more involved. So, I will patiently remain
> tuned in. :-)
No, the DEFINE_PER_CPU was removed accidentaly. Should have stayed there
Thanks,
tglx
--------
Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
#include <asm/bug.h>
#include <asm/machdep.h>
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ppc64_tlb_batch, ppc64_tlb_batch);
+
/*
* A linux PTE was changed and the corresponding hash table entry
* neesd to be flushed. This function will either perform the flush
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists