[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904020942181.4130@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Rees <drees76@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, David Rees wrote:
>
> MythTV actually uses fdatasync, not fsync (or at least that's what it
> did last time I looked at the source). Not sure how the behavior of
> fdatasync compares to sync_file_range.
fdatasync() _waits_ for the data to hit the disk.
sync_file_range() just starts writeout.
It _can_ do more - you can also ask for it to wait for previous write-out
in order to start _new_ writeout, or wait for the result, but you wouldn't
want to, not for something like this.
sync_file_range() is really a much nicer interface, and is a more extended
fdatasync() that actually matches what the kernel does internally.
You can think of fdatasync(fd) as a
sync_file_range(fd, 0, ~0ull,
SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_BEFORE | SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE | SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_AFTER);
and then you see why fdatasync is such a horrible interface.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists