linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/43] FS-Cache: Recruit a couple of page flags for cache management [ver #46]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:31:03 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/43] FS-Cache: Recruit a couple of page flags for cache management [ver #46]

On Friday 03 April 2009 04:09:15 David Howells wrote:
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> 
> > Comments about PG_private still stand.
> 
> Replies about PG_private still stand.
> 
> It's owned by fs/buffer.c, and if the 'netfs' uses that, then PG_private is
> not available.

Well in theory I still think it would be cleanest to modify buffer to
play more nicely with it. But maybe that ends up being harder to
distinguish the 3 cases of attached metadata on the page. I don't know,
you haven't posted any isofs code so either way it is inappropriate to
use up this extra page flag here.

Is isofs cache worth a page flag?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/