linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:56:10 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	David Rees <drees76@...il.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29

David Rees wrote:
> Either way - forcing the data to be synced to disk a couple times
> every second is a hack and causes fragmentation in filesystems without
> delayed allocation.  Fragmentation really goes up if you are recording
> multiple shows at once.

Check out posix_fallocate(3).  Not appropriate for every situation, 
might eat additional disk bandwidth...

But if you are looking to combat fragmentation, pre-allocation (manual 
or kernel-assisted) is a relevant technique.  Plus, overwriting existing 
data blocks is a LOT cheaper than appending to a file.  fsync's more 
quickly to disk, too.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/