[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238715399-22172-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:36:39 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] ext3: Fix chain verification in ext3_get_blocks()
Chain verification in ext3_get_blocks() has been hosed since it called
verify_chain(chain, NULL) which always returns success. As a result readers
could in theory race with truncate. On the other hand the race probably cannot
happen with the current locking scheme, since by the time ext3_truncate() is
called all the pages are already removed and hence get_block() shouldn't be
called on such pages...
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/ext3/inode.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
index 4a09ff1..4bab705 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ int ext3_get_blocks_handle(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
while (count < maxblocks && count <= blocks_to_boundary) {
ext3_fsblk_t blk;
- if (!verify_chain(chain, partial)) {
+ if (!verify_chain(chain, chain + depth - 1)) {
/*
* Indirect block might be removed by
* truncate while we were reading it.
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists