linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] v3 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:52:41 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, niv@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
	dhowells@...hat.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org, kernel@...tstofly.org,
	matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v3 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:36:05 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>> 
>> Andrew, what do you think?
>
> I'm really struggling to see how the 900-odd bytes saved justifies
> creating (yet another) variant of core kernel machinery.

Also it's unclear if anything special cased !SMP is worth it for the
future.  After all multi core or SMT is becoming more and more common even in
the embedded world.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/