linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ide-cd: cleanup cdrom_decode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200904031241.44597.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:41:44 +0200
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	petkovbb@...il.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ide-cd: cleanup cdrom_decode_status

On Friday 03 April 2009, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:08:39AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 April 2009, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > - have (almost) equal handling of commands based solely on sense_key
> > 
> > I'm having a VERY hard time trying to review this patch because at
> > the same time that codepaths were merged if()s were replaced by switch()
> > which in turn resulted in change of intendation... on top of that
> > the patch description is very vague about this part of the changes...
> 
> I completely and exactly understand what you are saying :), I thought so
> too when I looked at the diffs yesterday. Well, if it's any consolation, the
> patches've been tested so they seem to work :). Anyway, split version coming
> up...

The split version looks exactly the same except ide_cd_breathe() change
when it comes to the main part.

Did you send the wrong version by any chance?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/