[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090403115100.GH31399@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:51:00 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tracing/filters: use ring_buffer_discard_commit
for discarded events
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > [ 240.462396] [<ffffffff802c843b>] trace_function+0xab/0xc0
>
> Oo, you have trace filters in trace_function. I'm not sure we want
> that. If we do, please make it a separate function register. That
> is, the function tracer is such a extreme hot path, that I would
> like to avoid as many branch conditionals as possible. With the
> dynamic function tracing, we can pick functions that do conditions
> when we want them, and we can pick those that do not. If you look
> at some of the register_ftrace_function callers, you will see
> where I've picked different functions to be called by the tracer
> depending on what the options are.
Actually, i like Tom's idea very much: as it allows pretty flexible
context based filtering - not just function based filtering.
So we could filter for:
- a specific PID
- or a pattern of ->comm strings ['bash' or 'sshd' or 'hackbench']
- or we could filter for non-zero preempt-counts
(i.e. critical sections only).
So this extends the function symbol based regexp mechanism in a
quite natural way, and it would be sad to not do this just because
it's ... arguably hard to implement robustly ;-)
The filter expression predicaments are pre-constructed and static at
the point of execution, so they rely on no external facility other
than some internal C code. So it should be possible to do this.
And if the tracepoint causes runtime overhead .. we need to optimize
that. We could register a different, filter-aware mcount callback
depending on whether there's any filter defined there.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists