[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D5F8DA.20400@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:54:02 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, ghaskins@...ell.com,
anthony@...emonkey.ws, andi@...stfloor.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agraf@...e.de, pmullaney@...ell.com,
pmorreale@...ell.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:46:04PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> The host writes the packet to tap, at which point it is consumed from
>> its point of view. The host would like to mention that if there was an
>> API to notify it when the packet was actually consumed, then it would
>> gladly use it. Bonus points if this involves not copying the packet.
>>
>
> We're using write(2) for this, no?
Yes.
> That should invoke netif_rx_ni
> which blocks until the packet is "processed", which usually means
> that it's placed on the NIC's hardware queue.
>
It doesn't copy and queue the packet? We use O_NONBLOCK and poll() so
we can tell when we can queue without blocking.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists