[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090403010901.GB10545@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 02:09:01 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>,
"Andreas T.Auer" <andreas.t.auer_lkml_73537@...us.ath.cx>,
Alberto Gonzalez <info@...bu.es>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ext4 and the "30 second window of death"
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:59:53PM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> is laptop mode
>
> A. "write everything now, don't delay writes" in the hope that the drive
> will be idle enough later to spin down
laptop-mode doesn't delay writes. Ever.
> or
>
> B. "delay all writes until later, then when the drive wakes up do all
> pending writes at that time" so that the drive can go to sleep in the
> meantime?
Yes.
> I've heard things in these threads that would indicate both behaviors.
The code's pretty trivial. The only real functional differences
laptop-mode brings are to write out all dirty pages (rather than just
writing down to the watermark) and to call sys_sync() a few seconds
after the last thing that hit disk rather than being satisfied from
cache. It's entirely a mechanism to opportunistically take advantage of
the disk being spun up.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists