[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D56A7E.80908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:46:38 -0700
From: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: perf_counter: request for three more sample data options
Currently, perf_counter has the ability to record the following on event
counter overflow:
Instruction Pointer
Call chain
Group counter values
Thread id
To give perf_counter similar capabilities to perfmon2's default sampling
module, I'd like the following additional sample data to be added.
Time stamp
CPU number
Thread Group Id
I'd suggest the following
enum perf_counter_record_format {
PERF_RECORD_IP = 1U << 0,
PERF_RECORD_TID = 1U << 1,
PERF_RECORD_TGID = 1U << 2,
- PERF_RECORD_GROUP = 1U << 2,
+ PERF_RECORD_GROUP = 1U << 3,
- PERF_RECORD_CALLCHAIN = 1U << 3,
+ PERF_RECORD_CALLCHAIN = 1U << 4,
+ PERF_RECORD_CPU_ID = 1U << 5,
+ PERF_RECORD_TIMESTAMP = 1U << 6,
};
And of course the obvious changes to perf_event_type.
I would expect that CPU ID would be 32 bits, and the timestamp to be the
64-bit current time. TGID is the same size as TID.
I am guessing the only difficult thing here would be obtaining the
current time from an IRQ, especially NMI handler. Is this difficult?
--
Regards,
- Corey
Corey Ashford
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center, Linux Toolchain
Beaverton, OR
503-578-3507
cjashfor@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists