linux-kernel - RE: Re: [PATCH 08/14] NFSv4: Add label recommended attribute and NFSv4 flags (#6127-130006249-0129)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Sun Microsystems Sales Support <sun-sales-support@....com>
To:	"David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc:	casey@...aufler-ca.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, matthew.dodd@...rta.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	labeled-nfs@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH 08/14] NFSv4: Add label recommended attribute and
 NFSv4 flags (#6127-130006249-0129)




-----Original Message-----
From: David P. Quigley (dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov)
Sent: Apr 3, 2009 8:32:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] NFSv4: Add label recommended attribute and NFSv4 flags

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 22:43 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, David P. Quigley wrote:
> 
> > We tried to change this to be dynamically allocated based on what was
> > coming off of the wire but we ran into a problem that it required us to
> > do allocations where they really shouldn't be done in the rpc/nfsv4
> > code. Trond suggested to make this static and that if someone really
> > needed more than a page for their label that something was horrifically
> > wrong. I'm tempted to agree with him on this but there are people trying
> > to send contexts with an MLS component with every other compartment set
> > which tend to be really large. 
> 
> Well, future labels might include cryptographic information, for example.
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:

Message - ID: 134806025
From: dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] NFSv4: Add label recommended attribute and NFSv4 flags


Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:

Recipient Address:  Lawrence.Bowers@....com 
Reason:  This address is no longer available

> 

<removing people from the CC who probably don't care about this>

Could you expand on why this might be needed or what applications would
use this? It's unclear to me what sort of crypto information would be in
a context. I know the ecryptfs guys were trying to make crypto decisions
based on SELinux context in some cases but I never heard of wanting to
put that kind of information into the context.

Dave


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@...ho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/