[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D65619.8000708@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:31:53 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] Xen for 2.6.30 #2
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yes, but once dom0 goes in your incentive to fix the native kernel
> performance drain we accumulated along the years of paravirt layers
> will be strongly weakened, right? :)
Not at all. There's a pile of performance work that needs to be done,
both native and Xen. I've been addressing it in an ad-hoc, time-sliced
way so far, but I haven't had the chance to concentrate on it as I'd
like to. Once I get all the basic stuff off my plate I'll be able to
actually focus.
Besides, its not really the sort of "incentive" that I respond to; I
find it demotivating because it carries the presumption that I won't do
"the right thing" without some element of coercion. It's not like I
don't already do a fair amount of generally beneficial kernel work. If
you think I should direct my attention in one direction over another,
I'm happy to take suggestions.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists