[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440904031349v31f84f8anf082db7505e60387@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:49:27 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Cc: Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr> wrote:
> Chris Worley wrote:
>> Sorry for an off topic, but I'm hoping somebody can point me in the
>> right direction of where to direct this question...
>>
>> I have an Opteron system where I've seen the HW diagrams, and each of
>> 4 sockets is directly connected (HT) to two other sockets, and two HT
>> hops away from a third (i.e. a simple square topology, no X in the
>> middle).
>>
>> Yet, "numactl --hardware" shows but one hop to each socket:
>>
>> # numactl --hardware
>> ...
>> node 0 1 2 3
>> 0: 10 20 20 20
>> 1: 20 10 20 20
>> 2: 20 20 10 20
>> 3: 20 20 20 10
>>
>> I know this is wrong.
>>
>> Who would be the right person (or list) to talk about this?
>>
>
> IIRC, the motherboard/BIOS is supposed to report numa distances through
> the PXM ACPI method. But I have never seen any opteron box do it
> properly. So you just get 10 for "local" and 20 for "remote". Some
> Itanium machines however report actual distances.
for x86 64 bit, we are copying SLIT table and save another copy.
could provide one /sys interface to make user could modify it...
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists