linux-kernel - Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:18:58 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:54 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> That's the same really. Think about it. No SLIT on a NUMA system is a wrong
>> SLIT.
>>
>
> Unless each node really is symmetrically distant from each other node, in
> which case the distance is reported correctly as a result of the differing
> pxms.
>

when ACPI is used, first PXM show up in SRAT table will become node0...
so you already have node_to_pxm mapping.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/