[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238798924.3130.72.camel@palomino.walls.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:48:44 -0400
From: Andy Walls <awalls@...ix.net>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: When is a wake_up() not a wake up?
Hi. I've got a problem where in the cx18 driver, the wake_up() call
doesn't seem to be waking up a process or work queue thread that tried
to wait on a wait queue.
While doing some investigation, I found I was unable to understand the
conditions under which try_to_wake_up() will return success or not. Can
anyone give short summary on the conditions under which it does not?
FYI:
$ uname -a
Linux palomino.walls.org 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 14:47:52 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Also, just to provide some context on the larger problem, here's what's
supposed to happen in the cx18 driver:
1. A work queue thread or read() call needs to send a command to the
CX23418 using the cx18_api_call() function
2. It fills out a mailbox with a command for the CX23418
3. It prepares to wait, just in case a wait is needed
4. A SW1 interrupt is sent to the CX23418 telling it a mailbox is ready
5. The ack filed in the mailbox, a PCI MMIO location, is checked to see
if the mailbox was ack'ed already
6. If not, schedule_timeout() for up to 10 msecs (a near eternity...)
7. Clean up the wait and move on
In response to the SW1 interrupt in step 4 above, the CX23418 processes
the command mailbox, fills out the "ack" field in the mailbox with a
good value, and sends a SW2 ack interrupt back. The cx18_irq_hander()
calls wake_up() in response to this.
However, I am running across occasions where the maximum timeout has
expired, and the mailbox has been ack'ed. It's as if the wake_up()
didn't work. Here's a sample from the log:
Mar 31 23:36:56 palomino kernel: cx18-0: irq: sending interrupt SW1: 8 to send CX18_CPU_DE_SET_MDL
Mar 31 23:36:56 palomino kernel: cx18-0: api: scheduling to wait for ack of CX18_CPU_DE_SET_MDL: req 51267 ack 51266, pid 21092, state 2
Mar 31 23:36:56 palomino kernel: cx18-0: irq: received interrupts SW1: 0 SW2: 8 HW2: 0
Mar 31 23:36:56 palomino kernel: cx18-0: irq: Wake up initiated on pid 21092 in state 2
Mar 31 23:36:56 palomino kernel: cx18-0: irq: Wake up succeeded on pid 21092, state 2 -> 0
Mar 31 23:36:56 palomino kernel: cx18-0: api: done wait for ack of CX18_CPU_DE_SET_MDL: req 51267 ack 51267, current pid 21092, current state 0, state 0
Mar 31 23:36:56 palomino kernel: cx18-0: warning: failed to be awakened upon RPU acknowledgment sending CX18_CPU_DE_SET_MDL; timed out waiting 10 msecs
A wait of 10 msecs is not impossible I guess. However, they should be
much less frequent that what I am seeing in my logs, given that this is
an ATSC video stream capture.
Here's the highlights from a patched cx18 driver that I have in place to
try and see what's going on:
static int cx18_autoremove_wake_function(wait_queue_t *w, unsigned mode,
int sync, void *key)
{
struct cx18 *cx = key;
struct task_struct *t = w->private;
long old_state;
int ret;
old_state = t->state;
CX18_DEBUG_HI_IRQ("Wake up initiated on pid %d in state %lx\n",
task_pid_nr(t), old_state);
ret = default_wake_function(w, mode, sync, NULL);
if (ret) {
CX18_DEBUG_HI_IRQ("Wake up succeeded on pid %d, "
"state %lx -> %lx\n",
task_pid_nr(t), old_state, t->state);
list_del_init(&w->task_list);
} else {
CX18_DEBUG_WARN("Wake up failed on pid %d, "
"state %lx -> %lx\n",
task_pid_nr(t), old_state, t->state);
}
return ret;
}
static int cx18_api_call(struct cx18 *cx, u32 cmd, int args, u32 data[])
{
u32 state, irq, req, ack, err;
struct cx18_mailbox __iomem *mb;
wait_queue_head_t *waitq;
struct mutex *mb_lock;
long int timeout, ret;
int i;
wait_queue_t w;
...
/* Setup pointers and values we need */
waitq = &cx->mb_cpu_waitq;
mb_lock = &cx->epu2cpu_mb_lock;
irq = IRQ_EPU_TO_CPU;
mb = &cx->scb->epu2cpu_mb;
...
/* Acquire the mutex for the mailbox, and put a request in it */
/* blah blah blah */
...
timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(10);
CX18_DEBUG_HI_IRQ("sending interrupt SW1: %x to send %s\n",
irq, info->name);
ret = timeout;
/* setup for a wait */
init_wait(&w);
w.func = cx18_autoremove_wake_function;
prepare_to_wait(waitq, &w, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
/* Tell the device our request is in it's mailbox */
cx18_write_reg_expect(cx, irq, SW1_INT_SET, irq, irq);
/* Did it ack our request already? */
ack = cx18_readl(cx, &mb->ack);
if (req != ack) {
CX18_DEBUG_HI_API("scheduling to wait for ack of %s: req %u "
"ack %u, pid %u, state %lx\n",
info->name, req, ack,
task_pid_nr(w.private),
((struct task_struct *)(w.private))->state);
/* Go to sleep. Wake up when the ack IRQ comes in or timeout */
ret = schedule_timeout(timeout);
ack = cx18_readl(cx, &mb->ack);
CX18_DEBUG_HI_API("done wait for ack of %s: req %u "
"ack %u, current pid %u, current state %lx, "
"state %lx\n",
info->name, req, ack,
task_pid_nr(current),
current->state,
((struct task_struct *)(w.private))->state);
}
finish_wait(waitq, &w);
if (req != ack) {
/* Release mutex, Log stuff */
return -EINVAL;
}
if (ret == 0)
CX18_DEBUG_WARN("failed to be awakened upon RPU acknowledgment "
"sending %s; timed out waiting %d msecs\n",
info->name, jiffies_to_msecs(timeout));
...
/* Unlock mutex, do other stuff */
return 0;
}
/* A simplified version of the IRQ handler for this ML post */
irqreturn_t cx18_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct cx18 *cx = (struct cx18 *)dev_id;
u32 sw1, sw2, hw2;
...
sw2 = cx18_read_reg(cx, SW2_INT_STATUS) & cx->sw2_irq_mask;
...
if (sw2)
cx18_write_reg_expect(cx, sw2, SW2_INT_STATUS, ~sw2, sw2);
...
if (sw1 || sw2 || hw2)
CX18_DEBUG_HI_IRQ("received interrupts "
"SW1: %x SW2: %x HW2: %x\n", sw1, sw2, hw2);
...
/* Did we get a mailbox ack? */
if (sw2 & IRQ_CPU_TO_EPU_ACK)
__wake_up(&cx->mb_cpu_waitq, TASK_NORMAL, 1, cx);
...
return (sw1 || sw2 || hw2) ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
}
Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists