linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49D8D809.8040503@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:10:49 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agraf@...e.de, pmullaney@...ell.com,
	pmorreale@...ell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> What we need is:
>
> 1) Lockless MMIO/PIO dispatch (there should be two IO registration 
> interfaces, a new lockless one and the legacy one)

Not sure exactly how much this is needed, since when there is no 
contention, locks are almost free (there's the atomic and cacheline 
bounce, but no syscall).

For any long operations, we should drop the lock (of course we need some 
kind of read/write lock or rcu to avoid hotunplug or reconfiguration).

> 2) A virtio-net thread that's independent of the IO thread.

Yes -- that saves us all the select() prologue (calculating new timeout) 
and the select() itself.



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/