[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090405164904.GJ6893@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:49:04 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dipankar@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, manfred@...orfullife.com,
peterz@...radead.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, kernel@...tstofly.org,
kyle@...artin.ca, deller@....de, davem@...emloft.net,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, jes@....com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, anton@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] Convert CONFIG_SMP=y powerpc defconfigs to
TREE_RCU.
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 12:37:59PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I'd suggest you dont do these dozens of defconfig updates at all -
> > arch maintainers can do this themselves, once the core kernel
> > default has been flipped.
>
> AFAIK they don't. There's no make updatemyconfigwithdefaultstatementsconfig
My guess is that I would in fact have to send a few patches. But I
suppose that the real question is "how long should we wait to drop
Classic RCU once the last arch has changed its defconfig?" I have
been assuming that we would wait one release cycle.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists