[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904051939.30170.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 19:39:29 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Warn if interrupts are enabled during suspend-resume of sysdevs
On Sunday 05 April 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >
> > Sysdev have to be suspended and resumed with interrupts disabled
> > and things usually break in a way that's difficult to debug if one
> > of sysdev drivers enables interrupts by mistake during suspend or
> > resume. Add extra checks that will generate warnings in such
> > cases.
>
> no objections - but obviously the real solution would be to finish
> PeterZ's "detect assymetric kernel functions" patch:
>
> That patch (Peter posted an initial version of it already on lkml)
> works the following way:
>
> the ftrace function-graph-tracer plugin is utilized to instrument
> every function call in the kernel. That is extended with the
> following check: every function except __lockfunc and __sched
> functions must be 'balanced' - i.e. they must enter and exit with
> the same IRQ flags, preempt count and lock depth counter.
Nothing wrong with that, but I'd also like to have checks that don't depend on
ftrace. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists