[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D90EED.2060703@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:05:01 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alejandro Riveira Fernández
<ariveira@...il.com>
CC: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
Bryan Henderson <hbryan@...ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Replacing VFAT as filesystem on removeable media
Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
>>>
>> Ironically enough, one of the better filesystems for being supported by
>> many OSes is probably ext2. However, that doesn't mean it is even in
>> the same rough ballpark as (V)FAT.
>
> What about UDF ?
Good point. UDF is probably widely supported, but again, not in the
same ballpark. I don't personally know how complex UDF is to implement
on a small memory device.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists