[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090405002013.GB7553@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 20:20:13 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 latency fixes
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 03:13:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And yes, anticipatory seems to be quite noticeably better than cfq here.
> With cfq I got a few two-second delays on 'ftruncate()' too (probably
> because of your new serialization code?), and the longest fsync() delay
> was over 7 seconds. That was definitely solidly in the "painful" category.
What is going on with in your "ftruncate()" case? The synchronization
code I added will do call filemap_flush() on close if the file
descriptor had been previously truncated down to zero, either because
it was opened with O_TRUNCATE, or if ftruncate(fd, 0) was explicitly
called. But it won't actually call fsync() or do anything special on
the actual ftrucate() call; it just sets a flag indicating that the
file in question should be flushed on close.
This is to make the right thing happen for applications which try to
edit a file in place via:
fd = open("foo", O_RDWR);
len = read(fd, buf, MAXBUF);
<modify buf>
ftruncate(fd, 0);
write(fd, buf, len);
close(fd);
Otherwise, given the lack of fsync(fd) in the above sequence, a crash
may leave he file "foo" truncated or only partially written out.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists