[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904051129.38904.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:29:38 +0200
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@...eros.com>,
wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k becon loss messages
On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:23:59 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> With latest linus tree I am getting, .config file attached:
>
> [ 22.895051] r8169: eth0: link down
> [ 22.897564] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> [ 22.928047] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
> [ 22.982292] libvirtd used greatest stack depth: 4200 bytes left
> [ 63.709879] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6
> [ 63.712096] wlan0: authenticated
> [ 63.712127] wlan0: associate with AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6
> [ 63.726831] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 (capab=0x471 status=0 aid=1)
> [ 63.726855] wlan0: associated
> [ 63.730093] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
> [ 74.296087] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
> [ 79.349044] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 119.358200] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 179.354292] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 259.366044] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 359.348292] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 361.953459] packagekitd used greatest stack depth: 4160 bytes left
> [ 478.824258] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 598.813343] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 718.817292] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 838.824567] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 958.815402] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1078.848434] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1198.822913] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1318.824931] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1438.814157] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1558.827336] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1678.823011] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1798.830589] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 1918.828044] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 2038.827224] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 2116.517152] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 2158.840243] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> [ 2278.827427] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
I think this message should only show if CONFIG_MAC80211_VERBOSE_DEBUG is set.
It's kind of expected that we lose a beacon once in a while, so we shouldn't print
verbose messages to the kernel log (even if they are KERN_DEBUG).
And besides that, I think one can easily remotely trigger this message and flood the logs.
So it should probably _also_ be ratelimited.
--
Greetings, Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists