linux-kernel - Re: ath9k becon loss messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200904061217.31134.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date:	Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:17:30 +0200
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To:	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@....fi>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@...eros.com>,
	wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k becon loss messages

On Monday 06 April 2009 09:14:31 Helmut Schaa wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. April 2009 schrieb Kalle Valo:
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> writes:
> > 
> > >> And besides that, I think one can easily remotely trigger this
> > >> message and flood the logs. So it should probably _also_ be
> > >> ratelimited.
> > >
> > > normally it prints after 120 seconds:
> > >
> > > [ 1078.848434] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> > > [ 1198.822913] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> > > [ 1318.824931] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
> 
> > Then there is something happening in ath9k or your AP which prevents
> > ath9k from receiving beacons. Try pinging your AP with 100 ms
> > interval. Do you see anything happening in 120 s intervals?
> 
> NetworkManager typically scans every 120 seconds and I can also trigger
> the messages by a manual scan with iwlist. I did not dig any further but
> the messages seem to appear right at the end of the scan. Tried with iwlagn
> and both sw_scan and hw_scan.

Yeah OK. While scanning it's expected to lose some frames.

However, the driver should probably protect against this by using the scan notification
callbacks. It could disable beacon-loss reporting while scanning.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/