[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090406140643.GL3795@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:06:44 -0400
From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, tytso@....edu,
jesper@...gh.cc,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 07:02:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Is dd + sync_file_range really a realistic comparison? dd is streaming
> as fast as the disk can output data, whereas MythTV is streaming as fast
> as video is being recorded. If you are maxing out your disk throughput,
> there will be obvious impact no matter what.
>
> I would think a more accurate comparison would be recording multiple
> video streams in parallel, comparing fsync/fdatasync/sync_file_range?
>
> IOW, what is an average MythTV setup -- what processes are actively
> reading/writing storage? Where are you noticing latencies, and does
> sync_file_range decrease those areas of high latency?
I am going to give the patch a shot. I run dual tuners after all, so
I do get multiple streams recording while doing playback at the same time.
--
Len Sorensen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists