[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7450FD1B-9C81-4C98-8A81-63999892A3A4@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:36:33 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@...assoc.com>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi_mpc83xx: Handles other Freescale processors
On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>
>>> With this patch we'll able to select spi_mpc83xx driver on the
>>> MPC86xx
>>> platforms. Let the driver depend on FSL_SOC, so we don't have to
>>> worry
>>> about Kconfig anymore.
>>>
>>> Also remove the "experimental" dependency, the driver has been
>>> tested
>>> to work on a various hardware, and surely not experimental anymore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/spi/Kconfig | 14 ++++++--------
>>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> this looks fine, but why don't we go ahead and rename things as well?
>> SPI_MPC83xx -> SPI_MPC8xxx, spi_mpc83xx.c -> spi_mpc8xxx.c
>
> mpc8xxx implies mpc82xx (e.g. mpc8272) which is not the same
> controller
> as on the mpc83xx
True, but normally the 82xx drivers are "cpm" prefixed. I think 8xxx
is at better name than 83xx.
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists