[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090406151931.GB25005@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:19:31 -0600
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] PCI changes for 2.6.30
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>:
> >
> > Reading through Documentation/PCI/pci.txt says that under
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG, __devinit should be a nop?
> The documentation is not up-to-date in this respect.
>
> Annotating a function __devinit will no matter the configuration
> locate the code in a section named .devinit.text
Ok, I'll update the documentation.
> We then postprocess this section for illegal references using modpost.
>
> The PCI_HOTPLUG code has often been troublesome with respect to these checks
> as this code is only relevant if CONFIG_HOTPLUG is enabled
> and will often not even be included in the kernel if not enabled.
> This is true for pci_rescan_bus() for example.
>
> And we would like to export these symbols too. But we do not allow exported
> symbols to be annotated __devinit as this code will be blown away in some configurations.
>
> So the correct solution which you also used in your patch is to tell
> modpost to ignore references to *init sections from this specific funtion
> as they are OK.
Does this count as an Acked-by?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists