[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090406170116.GH5178@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:01:16 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes
On Mon, Apr 06 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > Jens - I can just apply this queue (I want to test it out anyway), or if
> > > you prefer I can pull from you. Just tell me.
> >
> > Whatever you want, if you want to pull instead of manually applying,
> > it's:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git blk-latency
>
> Ok, I applied them for testing anyway, so I think I'll just keep the
> series I have in my tree. I'm keeping my nasty "dd+sync" going in the
No problem, the end result should be identical :-)
> background, just to verify that things really feel better, but I'm already
> convinced this is a winner. Especially with the request size limiter, I
> can really read email _almost_ as if nothing else was going on on the
> machine.
>
> With that request size limiting, my fsync pauses tend to be in the 250ms
> range, with a one 0.75s outlier in the last few minutes. I can definitely
> feel that quarter-second thing, and the .75s pause was a real stutter, but
> boy what a difference. I don't get the uncontrollable urge to kill that
> nasty background writer any more.
If we can make the dd writer almost unnoticable, then I think we've come
a long way already. That really is a nasty workload.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists